Complex of Squares
I asked my friend and supporter Nosherwan Minwalla what he would like to read about. He mentioned the control and usage of dark (light) squares. One of the good examples can be Kasparov-Shirov game from previous post. After removing Shirov’s light-squared bishop, Kasparov used unprotected f5 square to break into the black’s position.
Yoseliani-Gurieli
Frunze, 1978
White is trying to exploit open f-file and pressure on f7 pawn. She was hoping to win the exchange after..
29. Nxc6 bxc6 30. Bc5
…but completely underestimated transformation after unbalanced trade.
30… Nxc5! 31. Rxd8 Raxd8
If 31. Qxc5 Qe8 and black is comfortable. In the current position black has rook, bishop and pawn for white queen material wise. But looking deeper, we can notice that black light pieces are very well coordinated and he is controlling the entire complex of dark squares in and around the center.
32. Ne2
Natural aim to cover at least some of the dark squares. The transformation after the trades must have had negative psychological impact on Yoseliani. She was expecting to “crush” her opponent after winning the exchange (in case black didn’t play 31.. Nxc5), but instead she is forced to defend the position with badly coordinated pieces. Still, there was some tactical potential left. White could have tried 32. Nd5 with the idea of covering d-file after 32… cxd5 33. Qxc5. Possible line is 32. Nd5 Nxe4 33. Ne7 Kh8 34. Ng6! Kg8 (best) 35. Ne7 with repetition.
32… Na4
More active then Ne6. Black is inviting better endgame after 33. Ra1 Nxb2 34. Rxa5 Rd1 35. Bf1 Nc4 36. Rc5 Nd2 37. Rxe5 Rxf1 38. Qxf1 Nxf1 39. Kxf1 Ne6. White is playing better move, aiming to regroup its pieces.
33. Qe3 Ne6 34. Rf5
Another good move. Position is already unbalanced and pieces are counting in its relative value (not absolute). Be5 is worthy controller of dark squares complex. White wants to be ready for Rxe5 at the convenient moment.
34… f6 35. Qb3 Nac5 36. Qc4 Kg7
37. c3
Again, psychology - white is afraid of shadows and tries to take away d4 square. Instead of prophylactic defence, white should have played more aggressively in order to ruin excellent coordination of black pieces. Nc5 stands like a milestone, supporting black pieces and actively pressuring white’s position. Therefore, correct move was 37. b3 with idea of playing c3-b4 next.
37… a4!
Taking advantage of white’s inaccuracy. b4 is not possible anymore and Nc5 becomes eternal. Also b2 weakness is now fixed and ready to suffer after black moves his rook to b-file.
38. Rf3 Rd1 39. Bf1 Rb8 40. Ng3
Trying to achieve active counterplay. Probably a bit too late since black has upper hand after 37… a4.
40… Rxb2 41. Nf5
41. Nh5 Kf7 42. Nf6! was tricky but black can simply go to 41… Kg6.
41… Kf7
42. Nd4
42. Nh6 gives away crucial tempo, 42… Kg6 43. Nf5 a3 and pawn is unstoppable.
42… a3 43. Nxe6 Nxe6 44. Qa4 Rdd2!
White was looking for double attack on a3 and Rd1 but black has strong counter-threat 45. Qxa3 Bd6! with next Bc5 and Rh2 mate. Rest of the game goes without comments.
45. Bc4 Bh2 46. Kh1 Rb1 47. Rf1 a2 48. Bxe6 Kxe6 49. Qxc6 Bd6 50. Qc4 Ke7 51. e5 Bxe5 52. Qc5 Kd7 and white resigned 0-1
Chess Strategy » Archives » Methods Against Kings Indian said,
Wrote on November 10, 2006 @ 7:47 am
[…] Crucial move! You might wonder why is white “wasting his time” with pawn move when we said above that he is behind with development? Shouldn’t he do something about it? The answer is in transformation after white has blocked the center with d5. It is much harder to create concrete threats while game is temporary closed. On that note, black cannot open it now with 13… fxe4 14. Nxe4 because his light squares are horribly weak and Ne4 will be wonderfully placed on e6. If black tries to prevent Ng5 with 14… h6, white has 15. h5! g5 and Bg7 is locked forever. h4-h5 is key against black’s aggression on king side. Another good feature of h4 is that white can play Bh3 and exploit all of the weak light squares - see also previous post Complex of Squares. […]
Chess Strategy » Archives » Complex of Squares II said,
Wrote on February 3, 2007 @ 6:38 am
[…] Read also “Complex of Squares”. Posted in Lessons | Trackback | del.icio.us | Top Of Page Print This Post | EMail This Post […]
Carlsen - Cheparinov « Chess Strategy said,
Wrote on December 15, 2007 @ 10:06 am
[…] I was annotating this game for Chessdom, and since there were some wonderful ideas in the unbalanced endgame, I decided to share them here. […]