<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Play on both flanks</title>
	<link>http://www.chesslodge.com/2007/04/play-on-both-flanks/</link>
	<description>Free lessons on chess strategy</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Tom Chivers</title>
		<link>http://www.chesslodge.com/2007/04/play-on-both-flanks/#comment-398</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chesslodge.com/2007/04/play-on-both-flanks/#comment-398</guid>
					<description>Interesting. I've always found Karpov's annotations, translated into English, quite elusive. Perhaps English doesn't capture their spirit well.

Btw, Nunn says ..exf4 is still clear advantage white, but at least black gets a tiny amount of activity, and that instead after f4-f5, a breakthrough becomes inevitable on one side of the board or the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I&#8217;ve always found Karpov&#8217;s annotations, translated into English, quite elusive. Perhaps English doesn&#8217;t capture their spirit well.</p>
<p>Btw, Nunn says ..exf4 is still clear advantage white, but at least black gets a tiny amount of activity, and that instead after f4-f5, a breakthrough becomes inevitable on one side of the board or the other.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Goran Urosevic</title>
		<link>http://www.chesslodge.com/2007/04/play-on-both-flanks/#comment-397</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chesslodge.com/2007/04/play-on-both-flanks/#comment-397</guid>
					<description>If my translation is correct - Karpov: 30…exf4 is not cheerful either, 31.Nxf4 (31…Bh6 32.Nxg6). Black is forced to yield and wait.

In general, Soviet annotations are very interesting, they employ many battle/warrior expressions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If my translation is correct - Karpov: 30…exf4 is not cheerful either, 31.Nxf4 (31…Bh6 32.Nxg6). Black is forced to yield and wait.</p>
<p>In general, Soviet annotations are very interesting, they employ many battle/warrior expressions.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom Chivers</title>
		<link>http://www.chesslodge.com/2007/04/play-on-both-flanks/#comment-396</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 08:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chesslodge.com/2007/04/play-on-both-flanks/#comment-396</guid>
					<description>The book isn't by Nunn - he just wrote the introduction. It's by Levitt &#38; Friedgood. It's a really fascinating book though - slightly academic, but basically stuffed full of dazzling delights that they explain very well. I picked up mine cheaply via amazon. Also, here is a secret, it's the source for most of the best puzzles I've blogged. The guy who does the chessvibes.com weekly endgame studies has also featured a few from the book, this is probably just an overlap, but it ought give you a sense of the quality. I keep thinking I might do a PDF of my favourite positions from it, to share on the web; if I do I'll let you know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The book isn&#8217;t by Nunn - he just wrote the introduction. It&#8217;s by Levitt &amp; Friedgood. It&#8217;s a really fascinating book though - slightly academic, but basically stuffed full of dazzling delights that they explain very well. I picked up mine cheaply via amazon. Also, here is a secret, it&#8217;s the source for most of the best puzzles I&#8217;ve blogged. The guy who does the chessvibes.com weekly endgame studies has also featured a few from the book, this is probably just an overlap, but it ought give you a sense of the quality. I keep thinking I might do a PDF of my favourite positions from it, to share on the web; if I do I&#8217;ll let you know.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Goran Urosevic</title>
		<link>http://www.chesslodge.com/2007/04/play-on-both-flanks/#comment-395</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 21:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chesslodge.com/2007/04/play-on-both-flanks/#comment-395</guid>
					<description>Thanks Tom, that's really important remark about the space advantage! Unfortunately, I never had a chance to read Nunn's books, ordering a book online from Serbia is real pain. 

I have Karpov's book "Selected Games 1969-1977", but it's in Russian and I can't read the text. Let me ask someone for help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tom, that&#8217;s really important remark about the space advantage! Unfortunately, I never had a chance to read Nunn&#8217;s books, ordering a book online from Serbia is real pain. </p>
<p>I have Karpov&#8217;s book &#8220;Selected Games 1969-1977&#8243;, but it&#8217;s in Russian and I can&#8217;t read the text. Let me ask someone for help.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom Chivers</title>
		<link>http://www.chesslodge.com/2007/04/play-on-both-flanks/#comment-394</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 20:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chesslodge.com/2007/04/play-on-both-flanks/#comment-394</guid>
					<description>In the introduction to "Secrets of Spectacular Chess", an excellent book if you don't know it, Nunn analyzes the position after 24.Ba7!! (his exclams), and said this game convinced him for the first time "that strategic ideas could have a beauty all of their own" - as opposed to tactics, his preference.

His analysis has an additional emphasis to yours. Whilst he talks about the a-file plan, he also includes the slightly more abstract point that a space advantage such as white's is only useful if white can avoid exchanges. 24.Ba7 helps accomplish this.

He also gives 30...f6 a ?! saying the exchange on f4 was the best try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the introduction to &#8220;Secrets of Spectacular Chess&#8221;, an excellent book if you don&#8217;t know it, Nunn analyzes the position after 24.Ba7!! (his exclams), and said this game convinced him for the first time &#8220;that strategic ideas could have a beauty all of their own&#8221; - as opposed to tactics, his preference.</p>
<p>His analysis has an additional emphasis to yours. Whilst he talks about the a-file plan, he also includes the slightly more abstract point that a space advantage such as white&#8217;s is only useful if white can avoid exchanges. 24.Ba7 helps accomplish this.</p>
<p>He also gives 30&#8230;f6 a ?! saying the exchange on f4 was the best try.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
